A/s Sullivan Discusses Caspian Energy, Oecd, G8 Issues With French Fass

There is a variety of trucs de beaute that don’t have to be expensive to be effective. If you are in search for a good body scrub, mix one spoon of olive oil with a pinch of sea salt and make your skin soft and glowing again.

Classified by Economic Counselor Stuart Dwyer for reasons 1.4
(b) and (d)

¶1. (C) Summary: On February 14 A/S Dan Sullivan briefed French
FASS Jacques Lapouge on the state-of-play on Caspian energy and
his recent trip to the Caspian region. Sullivan said the U.S.
was “very interested” in the French proposal for an “IPR FATF”
tabled by Finance Minister Breton. On OECD enlargement Lapouge
said France supported Russia’s membership, but would be willing
to compromise on the eight recent EU accession state candidates
(even if publicly it would have to maintain support for all
eight). Lapouge and Sullivan touched on Open Skies, climate
change and export credits for Iran. End summary.

Energy and Climate Change

¶2. (SBU) A/S Dan Sullivan met with French FASS Jacques Lapouge
on the margins of the IEA’s February 13 – 14 Caspian gas market
diversity conference. Sullivan briefed Lapouge on his recent
trip to the Caspian region and U.S. views on the next phase of
gas development there. Sullivan said there was a window of
opportunity and strong regional interest in U.S. and EU
engagement to move things forward.

¶3. (C) Lapouge said the GOF — and the EU generally – had
obvious interests in the region, though there was a question of
whether there were sufficient resources to make the pipeline
project viable. Would Iranian gas have to be added to the mix
to achieve a critical mass, Lapouge wondered. Lapouge also
queried Sullivan on potential legal challenges of laying a pipe
across the Caspian, and whether there was regional interest in a
possible southern route through Iran. On the latter point
Sullivan said there was a strong sense that Iran was not a
reliable partner or energy supplier, and that he had made clear
on his travels that U.S. policy would not support such an
option. Lapouge concluded that the southern corridor project
was important and could put pressure on Russia, but that it’s
“not the Alpha and Omega” of European energy security.

¶4. (C) In a brief discussion on the notion of a “gas OPEC,”
Sullivan said that during his trip he took several opportunities
to underscore how inconsistent it would be for any party that
had signed on to the G8 St. Petersburg principles to support a
gas control concept diametrically opposed to those engagements.
Sullivan and Lapouge agreed that it might be useful to reiterate
the principles in the course of normal G8 follow-up on

¶5. (SBU) Lapouge said that France supported EU cooperation with
the United States on climate change technology. But the GOF
remained “very attached” to Kyoto-style constraints on
emissions, and support for the former should not be seen as a
weakening of commitment on the latter.


¶6. (SBU) Sullivan told Lapouge the U.S. was “very interested” in
the proposal tabled by Finance Minister Breton in the G7 for
establishing a FATF-like organization for IPR issues. He noted
that the United States had shared the idea of an IPR “gold
standard.” At some point, though, discussion of Breton’s
proposal might be moved to the G8. Lapouge suggested that
Breton may have raised the initiative within the G7 so that it
could be pushed forward by truly like-minded countries.

Open Skies

¶7. (SBU) In a brief discussion on Open Skies Lapouge said the
GOF was very supportive of getting to an agreement.
Negotiations were in the Commission’s hands and there was
“little maneuvering room” on ownership restrictions issues. But
France “definitely” wanted an agreement.

OECD Enlargement

¶8. (C) On OECD enlargement Lapouge said France supported
Russia’s accession. If Russia was “good enough” to be in the
WTO, it would also meet the bar for OECD membership. While
France had to maintain public support for the candidacies of
eight recent EU accession states, it understood the need for a
balanced enlargement and would be willing to compromise.

Export Credits to Iran

PARIS 00000735 002 OF 002

¶9. (C) A/S Sullivan commended, and asked for more information
about, the recent tightening of French policy on export credits
for Iran (reftel). Lapouge said institutions entering into
transactions would have to sign a letter indicating an
understanding of limitations imposed by UNSCR 1737, and the
legal consequences of any violations. The GOF had also lowered
the credit ceiling for Iran, reflecting changes in risk ratings.
However Lapouge made clear that the changes did not represent
the full prohibition on export credits requested by the United
States. Trade not covered by 1737 – consisting largely of cars
and car parts according to Lapouge — continued and could be
supported with export credits. Lapouge assented to Sullivan’s
characterization of the change as moving “half way” to what the
United States was pushing.

¶10. (U) A/S Sullivan has cleared this cable.